Legal Opinion
City Holding Co. v. Hosch
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 24, 1929No. 6 Div. 422PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The submission is upon the motion to dismiss the appeal and upon the merits. The supersedeas bond, dated January 10,1929, recites:
“The condition of the above obligation, that whereas, the above bound City Holding Company has this day applied for and obtained an appeal returnable to the Court of Appeals of Alabama, to supersede and reverse judgment recovered by the said E. E. Hosch against the said City Holding Company at the present term, 192 — , of the Circuit Court for two hundred and fifty-six ($256.00) dollars, besides costs.”
The notice of the.appeal is:
“Whereas, City Holding Co.,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oliver v. KinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Shahan v. Herzberg, Simpson & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Rhodes & Broadfoot v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
- Ex Parte TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lokey v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Johnson v. RagsdaleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
- Kelley v. LovettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Sterling Braid Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953