Legal Opinion

City Holding Co. v. Hosch

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 24, 1929No. 6 Div. 422PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The submission is upon the motion to dismiss the appeal and upon the merits. The supersedeas bond, dated January 10,1929, recites:

“The condition of the above obligation, that whereas, the above bound City Holding Company has this day applied for and obtained an appeal returnable to the Court of Appeals of Alabama, to supersede and reverse judgment recovered by the said E. E. Hosch against the said City Holding Company at the present term, 192 — , of the Circuit Court for two hundred and fifty-six ($256.00) dollars, besides costs.”

The notice of the.appeal is:

“Whereas, City Holding Co.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oliver v. KinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Shahan v. Herzberg, Simpson & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Rhodes & Broadfoot v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  4. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  5. Ex Parte TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lokey v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Johnson v. RagsdaleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  3. Kelley v. LovettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. Sterling Braid Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API