Legal Opinion · Dissent
Aydlett v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided September 20, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1DissentWalker, J.
The following issues were submitted to the jury:
1. Has the plaintiff been damaged by the negligence of the defendant Norfolk Southern Railroad, by reason of transporting said sweet potatoes in an unsuitable and unfit car, as alleged? Answer: "Yes."
2. What damage, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant Norfolk Southern Railroad? Answer: "$256.55, with interest from 23 December, 1913."
Similar issues were submitted as to the other two defendants and were answered in like manner. From the judgment rendered, the defendants appealed. This action is brought to recover damages…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. Commercial Guano Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Baltimore, Chesapeake & Atlantic Rwy. Co. v. SperberCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
- Parker Buggy Corp. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Brinson v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Mewborn v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Produce Trading Co. v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Collins v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Anderson v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Gilikin v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917