Legal Opinion

Loughran v. the Phillies

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 23, 2005PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of appellees.1 Appellant claims the trial court misapplied the “no duty” rule in finding that a spectator at a major league baseball game is not owed a duty by either the team or individual player to protect against a ball thrown into the stands; and that the trial court incorrectly found that his injury was an inherent risk of attending the game. We disagree with appellant, and affirm the order of the trial court.

¶ 2 On July 5, 2003, Jeremy Loughran (appellant) attended a baseball game between the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. Three Rivers Management Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Schentzel v. Philadelphia National League ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Romeo v. Pittsburgh AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Iervolino v. Pittsburgh Athletic Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Dalton v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. John Coomer v. Kansas City Royals Baseball CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  2. Nissley v. Candytown Motorcycle Club, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Hawkins v. Switchback MX, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Craig v. Amateur Softball Ass'n of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Barillari v. SKI Shawnee, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API