Loughran v. the Phillies
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, J.:
¶ 1 This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of appellees.1 Appellant claims the trial court misapplied the “no duty” rule in finding that a spectator at a major league baseball game is not owed a duty by either the team or individual player to protect against a ball thrown into the stands; and that the trial court incorrectly found that his injury was an inherent risk of attending the game. We disagree with appellant, and affirm the order of the trial court.
¶ 2 On July 5, 2003, Jeremy Loughran (appellant) attended a baseball game between the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. Three Rivers Management Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Schentzel v. Philadelphia National League ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Romeo v. Pittsburgh AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Iervolino v. Pittsburgh Athletic Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Dalton v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
3Cited by18 opinions
- John Coomer v. Kansas City Royals Baseball CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- Nissley v. Candytown Motorcycle Club, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Hawkins v. Switchback MX, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Craig v. Amateur Softball Ass'n of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Barillari v. SKI Shawnee, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.