Legal Opinion

Strategical Demolition Torpedo Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 3, 1953No. 444-52PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge

The plaintiff corporation sues to recover just compensation for the use by the Government of a type of demolition torpedo on which the plaintiff had a patent. The Government moves to dismiss the petition on the ground that the statute giving persons, situated as the plaintiff is, a right to sue, did not become effective until July 17, 1952, and that the plaintiff’s patent had expired before that time. The Government says that the statute had no retroactive effect, and that, therefore, the plaintiff never acquired a right of action.

The plaintiff urges that Congress intended to give the statute…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hassett v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Shwab v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. The Western MaidSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Winfree v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Wayne B. ClizerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  2. Hebern v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  3. Blueport Co., LLP v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Stub v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API