Staring Co. v. Rossman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to cancel a deed. The case was tried before Steele, J., who made findings and ordered judgment ' in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the Court
Dibell, C.
Action to cancel a deed. Findings for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals from the order denjdng his motion for a new trial.
1. The facts found by the court upon disputed evidence are brief. On November. 15, 1913, plaintiff sold defendant a lot in Minneapolis for $525 on small monthly payments. At the time this controversy arose there was due upon it $4=55. About the same time the plaintiff and defendant entered into this agreement: The defendant, who was a building contractor, was to erect a house upon the lot. The plaintiff was to advance him certain moneys from time to time and did…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Julius Kessler & Co. v. PareliusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Karbach v. GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Loveland v. SteenersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
3Cited by3 opinions
- Engel v. MahlenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Village of Wells v. Layne-Minnesota Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Schultz v. SpicerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923