Loveland v. Steenerson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Polk county to recover $200 for goods sold and delivered under a written contract. The case was tried before Watts, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of defendant. From an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Plaintiffs are manufacturers and dealers in jewelry, with their place of business at Iowa City, Iowa. Defendant is a general merchant residing and doing business at Climax, in Clay county, this state. On September 17, 1902, he delivered to a traveling representative of plaintiffs a written order for certain specified articles of jewelry to be shipped to him at his place of business on the terms and conditions therein stated. The written order called for “rolled gold plate” jewelry, and attached thereto was a memorandum containing stipulations and agreements to be performed by plaintiffs,…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Julius Kessler & Co. v. PareliusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Staring Co. v. RossmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Loveland v. BeumerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Ziehme v. SimmsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909