Legal Opinion
COCKERILL v. CORTEVA, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 1, 2023No. 2:21-cv-03966Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT F. COCKERILL et al., CIVIL ACTION Plaintiffs, NO. 21-3966 v. CORTEVA, INC. et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND FOR RECONSIDERATION Baylson, J. September 1, 2023 Congress gave federal courts significant responsibilities when it passed ERISA. Public policy demands that the Court take proper and plausible allegations seriously to vindicate the rights Congress sought to protect through the act. The crux of Plaintiffs’ allegations is a significant failure to disclose material facts resulting…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.