Legal Opinion

CRAIG CRAWFORD v. Liz Claiborne, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, the case remitted to the Appellate Division for further proceedings in accordance with this decision and the certified question answered in the negative.

On September 24, 2004, plaintiff Craig Crawford brought a Human Rights Law action in Supreme Court, New York County, against his employer, Liz Claiborne, Inc., and other parties alleging discrimination based on sexual orientation. On April 11, 2005, the IAS Judge issued a preliminary conference order (PCO) directing that dispositive motions be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Crawford v. Liz Claiborne, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boereau v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. RXR WWP Owner LLC v. WWP Sponsor, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. R&R Capital LLC v. MerrittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Mateo v. 63, 65 & 67 W. 107th St. CondominiumNew York Supreme Court, New York County · 2024
  5. Mateo v. 63,65 & 67 W. 107th St. CondominiumNew York Supreme Court, New York County · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API