Legal Opinion

Roths Central Garage v. Holmes

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 6, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiskell, J.

This suit was instituted by the plaintiff against the defendant, a bailee for hire, for alleged damage done to plaintiff’s automobile while in the defendant’s possession on March 12, 1928.

The defendant is a Tennessee corporation and maintains and operates a public garage at 206 Union avenue, in the City of Memphis, for the care, storage and safe keeping of automobiles for hire.

It occupies a five story, fire proof building with its entrance facing on Union avenue. The second and third floors of the building are used for the storage of ears of regular monthly customers.

The usual and customary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Miles v. International Hotel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. North Memphis Sav. Bank v. Union Bridge & Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Hanes v. . ShapiroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Sanford v. KimballSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Steiner-Liff Iron & Metal Co. v. Woodmont Country ClubTennessee Supreme Court · 1972
  2. General Contract Purchase Corp. v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  3. Dickson v. BlackerTennessee Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API