Legal Opinion

Kramer v. Chapman & Gerber, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 6, 1970No. 39369PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DREW, Justice.

The question presented here is whether the Judge of Industrial Claims may, sua sponte, extend the time for taking testimony beyond the eight-month period allowed by Rule No. 3 of the Florida Industrial Commission, now the Industrial Relations Commission.

The identical question was before the Court in Black v. Blue Ribbon Laundry.1 In that case we said:2

“We construe Rule 3 to fix a time limit for the taking of testimony from the date announced for the first hearing. This is the date when the first hearing is scheduled to be heard. If the hearing is not heard on that date,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schneider v. Gustafson Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1962
  2. Black v. Blue Ribbon LaundrySupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  3. Sweeney v. Pine Island Citrus Groves, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1970
  4. Perez v. Carillon HotelSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  5. Heath v. Thomas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Kikilis FloristSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  2. Tropicana Products, Inc. v. ParrishSupreme Court of Florida · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API