Legal Opinion

Smith v. Kikilis Florist

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 6, 1974No. 44302PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEKLE, Justice.

This cause comes before us on petition for writ of certiorari to the Industrial Relations Commission. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const., F.S.A. In accordance with F.A.R. 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A., we dispense with oral argument of the cause.

Petitioner filed a claim for workmen’s compensation benefits on July 6, 1970, alleging a compensable accident on May 9, 1970, for which benefits were claimed to be due.1 At the employer’s request, a *24hearing on the merits was set for September 22, 1971. This hearing was cancelled and rescheduled for November 1,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Black v. Blue Ribbon LaundrySupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  2. Sweeney v. Pine Island Citrus Groves, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1970
  3. Perez v. Carillon HotelSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  4. B. F. Todd Electrical Contractors v. HammondSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  5. Knell v. Southgate Towers Restaurant, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tropicana Products, Inc. v. ParrishSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  2. Vogel v. City of Coral GablesSupreme Court of Florida · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API