Wittemann Bros. v. Wittemann Co.
New York Supreme Court
Demurrer to complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
The plaintiff and the defendant are each engaged in the business of manufacturing machinery for brewers. The defendant evidently has letters "patent covering certain machines or parts thereof, but it is not alleged that the plaintiff has any such patent. Prior to December of 1912 the plaintiff installed its carbonating system under contract for the Keystone Brewing Company, of Dunmore, Penn., and thereupon the defendant sent a communication to that company which is the basis of this action for libel. The plaintiff sets it forth, with innuendos, as follows: ‘ ‘ The carbonating system installed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pratt v. Paris Gas Light & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Kendall v. . StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Hovey v. . Rubber Tip Pencil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Bailey v. DeanNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- Middlebrook v. . BroadbentNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Construction Technology v. Lockformer Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Garver v. Public Service Company of New MexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Becher v. Contoure Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Hold Stitch Fabric MacH. Co. v. May Hosiery MillsTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
- Ideal Toy Corp. v. Newman Premier Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.