Legal Opinion

Allen v. Shows

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 26, 1988No. 88-31PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHAN, Judge.

We affirm the summary judgment entered in favor of defendant truck owner in this suit for injuries which had allegedly been caused to plaintiff by the driver of the truck.

The record before the trial court at the summary judgment hearing established that at the time of the accident the truck was being driven without defendant’s consent and, in fact, contrary to his specific orders. Thus, contrary to plaintiff’s contention, both express and implied consent of an owner, either of which is required in this kind of case for vicarious liability of *1305the owner, are lacking. See Pearson v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. DeMesme v. StephensonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Pearson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Southern California Funding, Inc. v. HuttoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Congress Park Office Condos II, LLC v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. Marshall v. GawelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Duarte v. WetzelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. Sevilla v. DominguezCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API