Legal Opinion

Mullen v. McGeagh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1926No. Appeal 3PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

That the plaintiff sustained a serious injury when she fell in descending the stairway in the McG-eagh building is shown by sufficient evidence. It is not controverted that she was lawfully on the stairway. She had attended ia meeting on the fourth floor in a hall leased by a mute society at which a lecture was delivered and was returning therefrom when she fell. She had gone to the hall in an elevator provided by the owners for the accommodation of tenants in the building, a seven-story structure occupied as offices and for other purposes. There is evidence that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. RileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  2. Gardner v. KiehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. Becker v. Lebanon & Myerstown Street Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  4. Einfeld v. ShermerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Potter v. McCoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stone v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Gable v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Arndt v. Brockhausen Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Shuster v. Jaffola & Mark, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1935
  5. Van Tassel v. Churchill, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Tioga County1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API