Shuster v. Jaffola & Mark, Inc.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
1Opinion of the Court
MacNeille, J.,
This case was tried before a jury and a verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $750. Defendant has moved for judgment n. o. v. and plaintiff has filed a motion for a new trial.
Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial is based on the ground of inadequacy of verdict. The injuries to the plaintiff were serious, entailed a great amount of pain and suffering. Although he was incapacitated for a long time, he received his pay, but his medical expenses and things incidental thereto amounted to $417.90.
We think the verdict was inadequate and on this ground the plaintiff…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Haugh v. Harris Bros. Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Hoffner Et Ux. v. BergdollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Davis v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Conboy v. Osage Tribe No. 113Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- John v. Reick-Mcjunkin Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.