Siegel v. Kovinsky
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, second district, in favor of plaintiff, after a trial by a judge without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.
Plaintiff sued for goods sold and delivered. Defendant pleaded payment. Plaintiff is the liquidating partner of the partnership of Siegel & Scheinbaum, which was doing business under the name of the S. & S. Silk Mills.
Defendant testified that one Schrager called upon him representing the S. & S. Silk Mills and sold him three lots of goods. Defendant received three separate bills for these goods and paid the bills by three separate checks drawn to the order of the S. & S. Silk Mills and given on three different occasions personally to Schrager, who then marked the bills “ paid.” The first two…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Thomson v. . Bank of British North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Schmidt v. Garfield Nat. BankNew York Supreme Court · 1892
- Robinson v. . Chemical National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Sage v. BurtonNew York Supreme Court · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Navrides v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Hutzler v. Hertz Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Bank of Charleston, Nat. Banking Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920
- Szwento Juozupo Let Draugystes v. Manhattan Savings InstitutionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Chatham Securities Corp. v. J. R. Williston & BeaneNew York Supreme Court · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.