Legal Opinion

Hannah Fredrickson v. Starbucks Corp

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 3, 2016No. 13-36067PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WATFORD, Circuit Judge:

' This is a class action brought against Starbucks by three baristas who used to work at the company’s coffee shops in Oregon. They challenge the legality of Starbucks’ practice of withholding state and federal toes from baristas’ paychecks based on the cash tips they receive. We must decide whether the district court-may hear this case given the constraints imposed by the Tax Injunction Act, the Anti-Injunction Act, and the federal-state comity doctrine.

I

A familiar sight at any neighborhood Starbucks is the tip jar near the cash register inviting customers to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Hibbs v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. California v. Grace Brethren ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Levin v. Commerce Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. United States v. American Friends Service CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. E. Marvin Herr v. Pequea TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. Peridot Tree, Inc. v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  3. Lawrence Gwozdz v. Healthport Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  4. Eric Gilbert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. Thorp v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API