Legal Opinion

McNiff v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 18, 2008No. 4-07-0817PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Turner

In August 2005, plaintiff, Courtney McNiff, brought suit to recover damages against defendants, Mazda Motor of America, Inc. (Mazda), and Sam Leman Mazda, for breach of written warranty and breach of implied warranty of merchantability. The parties eventually settled. In March 2007, plaintiff filed a petition for an award of costs and attorney fees. In May 2007, the trial court awarded plaintiffs two attorneys a total of $26,015.50 in fees and costs. Defendant Mazda and plaintiff filed motions to reconsider, both of which the court denied.

On appeal, defendant Mazda argues the trial court (1)…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Keller v. State Farm InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  3. Majcher v. Laurel Motors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. Central Illinois Electrical Services, L.L.C. v. SlepianAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. Berlak v. Villa Scalabrini Home for the Aged, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. Astor Plaza Condominium AssociationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  2. Country Mutual Insurance v. Styck's Body Shop, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Shoreline Towers Condominium Association v. GassmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. BarreraAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
  5. F.R.S. Development Co., Inc. v. American Community Bank & TrustAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API