Legal Opinion
West Valley City v. Martin
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided September 23, 2004No. 20030299-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THORNE, Judge:
¶ 1 West Valley City appeals from the trial court’s memorandum decision denying its motion for summary judgment on Douglas W. Martin’s claim for just compensation following condemnation of a leasehold interest. We reverse.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 In 1996, Martin purchased a Fantastic Sam’s franchise located in West Valley City (the City). The franchise, a hair salon, occupied a leased portion of the first floor of a commercial building (the Heartland property) owned by Heartland West Valley Commercial Limited Partners II (Heartland). The lease came up for renewal in 1998 and Martin…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- WebBank v. American General Annuity Service Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Fibreglas Fabricators, Inc. v. KylbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Penelko, Inc. v. John Price Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
- Elm, Inc. v. M.T. Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1998
- Schmidt v. L. & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Russell v. LundbergCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005