Legal Opinion

Charlebois v. Renaud

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1931No. Civil No. 2983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an action brought by Louis J., Martin N., Ferdinand A., Arthur J. and George J. Charlebois, and Blanche C. Cavaness, hereinafter called appellants, against Mary Benaud and Seraphine Carter, as executrix of the last will and testament of Henry Benaud, deceased, hereinafter called appellees, for the purpose of impressing a trust on certain property on account of funds alleged to have been received by Henry and Mary Renaud from the property of the estate of appellants’ father. The case was tried before the court sitting- without a jury, and judgment was rendered in favor of appellees,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Heydenfeldt v. Daney Gold and Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. De Haro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Howard v. PerrinArizona Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Moeur v. Farm Builders Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Howard v. PerrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Patel v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  2. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. WhitcombDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1926
  3. Patel v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  4. Upen G. Patel and Avanti D. Patel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  5. Upen G. Patel and Avanti D. Patel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API