Legal Opinion

Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Whitcomb

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided April 22, 1926No. 166-E, 167-EPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBSTER, District Judge.

These eases, by agreement of counsel consolidated for the purpose of taking testimony before the special master, have been dealt with by him in a single report, and will therefore be considered together. No attempt will be made to detail the history of this complicated and protracted litigation as it has taken its course through. state and federal courts. For the purpose of our present inquiries, it will perhaps suffice to say that on March 31, 1923, the Department of Public Woi'ks of the state of Washington (hereinafter called the department) made two orders affecting…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Pac. T. T. Co. v. D.P.S.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Petitions of New England Tel. & Tel. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1951
  4. Denver Union Stock Yard Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1932
  5. In Re Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API