State v. Dent
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.
Roland C. Dent appeals his conviction of conspiracy to commit first degree murder. Dent contends that the trial court erred (1) in denying his request for a jury instruction defining a substantial step, (2) in defining a substantial step as conduct which strongly indicates a criminal purpose, and (3) in failing to instruct the jury that the State was required to prove venue in Snohomish County; and contends there was insufficient evidence to support the substantial step element.
While incarcerated on a parole violation Dent contacted Carlos Balcinde to murder Ann Powell. Dent corresponded with…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. BondsWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Marino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Gammon v. Clark Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. DentWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- State Of Washington v. Robert MaddausCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State Of Washington v. Robert MaddausCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013