Legal Opinion

Hancock v. First Stuttgart Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 24, 1996No. CA 94-1090PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judith Rogers, Judge.

The appellant, Reola Hancock, has appealed from a summary judgment in favor of appellee, First Stuttgart Bank and Trust Co., in which it was held that appellant’s complaint for the tort of outrage was barred under the doctrine of res judicata. For reversal, appellant contends that the application of that doctrine was improper under the circumstances of this case. Because the specific argument raised by appellant is without merit, we affirm.

In February of 1994, appellant filed suit against appellee in federal court pursuant to 15 U.S.C.A. § 1691, the Equal Credit…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. John C. Noble v. F.A. White, Jr. And Claiborne County Mississippi Board of Election Commissioners, F.A. White, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. Richard Baker, Cross-Appellee v. Farmers Electric Cooperative, Inc. And Lawson WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Swofford v. StaffordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Schmidt v. McIlroy Bank & TrustSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Andujar v. NATIONAL PROPERTY & CAS. UNDERWRITERSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bosquet v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Baptist Health v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API