Legal Opinion

Finn v. Witherbee

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1954No. Civ. 19783PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Appellant Witherbee sued plaintiff Finn in the municipal court for rent and caused a writ of attachment to be issued and levied upon three recording machines of plaintiff. Prior to issuance of such writ, Witherbee filed an undertaking on attachment whereby appellants Lumsden and Bobnik as sureties promised to pay all costs and damages that might be sustained by Finn if he should prevail in the attachment suit, not to exceed $2,400. Thereafter final judgment was entered in favor of Finn, denying Witherbee any recovery. The instant action was subsequently filed in four counts as follows: count…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vesper v. Crane Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Atlas Development Co. v. National Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Morneault v. National Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Ross v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Sandvold v. PerrotCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morehouse v. Taubman Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Gray v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Florida Transportation Co. v. Dixie Sightseeing Tours, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  4. Campbell v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Bailey v. McDougalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API