Henderson v. State ex rel. Stout
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Marion Circuit Court.
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion.
McCabe, J.
I heartily concur in the foregoing opinion in so far as it holds the act not unconstitutional because of there being a plurality of subjects of legislation embraced therein. ■ I also concur in the prevailing opinion as to the duty of the courts to solve doubts as to the constitutionality of a statute in favor of its constitutionality because of the extraordinary power exerted in overthrowing the deliberate act of a co-ordinate branch of the State government. But in the balance of the opinion I can not concur. When there is no doubt as to the unconstitutionality of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- City of Valparaiso v. GardnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Hi-Voltage Wire Works, Inc. v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Harris v. HerrmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
- Devine v. Board of CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- People ex rel. Daniels v. HenshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.