Pan-American Life Insurance Co. v. Roethke
Kentucky Supreme Court
1DissentJohnstone, Justice
I agree with the majority that Maresca was an agent of PALIC and NIS notwithstanding the attempt to disavow Maresca’s agency status in the agreement between Maresca and NIS. However, while KRS 304.9-020 makes Maresca an agent for PALIC and NIS, it does not establish the scope of Maresca’s authority as the companies’ agent. “[A] statute making an insurance solicitor the agent of the insurer does *135not define the extent of the agent’s powers or the scope of his authority.” 16 Apple-man, Insurance Law and Practice § 8697. While the majority pays lip service to this point, it ignores a long and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mullins v. Commonwealth Life Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
- Celtic Life Insurance Co. v. CoatsTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Trotter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. TannenbaumCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
- Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.