Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Wolfe
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 16, 1957No. 5-1403, 5-1418PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddiN, Associate Justice.
These are companion cases arising from the same traffic mishap; and both' cases require a decision as to whether the Trial Court was correct in applying the doctrine of forum, non conveniens to actions arising under § 27-610 and § 27-dll Ark. Stats., which are venue statutes relating to damages claimed to result from an accident, such as the traffic mishap here involved.
Case No:.1403 in this Court is Hicks v. Wolfe, Judge, and is a petition for a Writ of Prohibition directed to the Sebastian Circuit Court, which had denied petitioners’ motion to quash…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. National City Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Ft. Smith Gas Co. v. Kincannon, JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Running v. Southwest Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Healey & Roth v. HuieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Kornegay v. Auten, Judge, on ExchangeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gulf Oil Company v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Zurick v. InmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- Torres v. GambleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas v. Gadbury-SwiftSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- King v. BeanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.