Legal Opinion

People v. Espinoza

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 18, 2001No. 99PDJ085PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS

SANCTION IMPOSED: ATTORNEY SUSPENDED FOR SIX (6) MONTHS WITH FORMAL REINSTATEMENT PROCEEDINGS REQUIRED

A trial was held on April 25, 2000, before the Presiding Disciplinary Judge ("PDJ") and two hearing board members, Daniel A. Vigil and Mickey W. Smith both members of the Bar. James C. Coyle, Assistant Attorney Regulation Counsel represented the People of the State of Colorado (the "People"). Pamela Espinoza ("Espinoza"), the respondent, did not appear either in person or by counsel.

The People's exhibits 1 through 8 were offered and admitted into evidence.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. People v. GaimaraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. People v. MayerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. People v. GoensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. KocelSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API