Legal Opinion

Yates v. Chandler

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

Complainant Yates filed this bill to restrain the cutting of certain timber on an adjoining tract of Duck River bottom land, owned by defendant Chandler. The Chancellor sustained a demurrer and complainant appeals.

The lands owned by the parties were formerly parts of a single tract lying on the east bank of the Duck River. In a division into four tracts made by inter, or cross, deeds executed in 1894, the land now owned by Chandler was conveyed to W. P.. Griner, and has passed through different subsequent owners tó Chandler. Yates acquired his title through another of the original partition…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Berryman v. Hotel Savoy CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Judd v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  3. Abbott v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. Marshall v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  5. Moore v. MorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Buffalo Academy of Sacred Heart v. Boehm Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Ridley v. HaimanTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Land Developers, Inc. v. MaxwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Arthur v. Lake Tansi Village, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  5. John Milton Arledge v. Darl SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API