Legal Opinion

United States v. Bernard

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 1, 1913No. 906Published

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 28138 (T. D. 32396),

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

The merchandise involved in this case consists of a bench lathe with an iron stand and treadle. When in use the machine is operated exclusively by force applied to the treadle by the foot of the operator.

*504• The collector assessed tbe importation at 45 per cent ad valorem as a manufacture of metal under tbe provisions of paragraph 199 of tbe tariff act of 1909.

-Tbe importers protested against that classification, claiming assessment of tbe article at 30 per cent ad valorem as a machine tool within tbe terms of paragraph 197 of tbe act.

The protest of the importers was sustained by tbe Board of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. United States v. KnauthCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API