Legal Opinion · Dissent

MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1959No. S. F. 20123Published

1DissentMcCOMB, J.

I dissent. It is my view that Canon 19 of Judicial Ethics of the American Bar Association relative to dissenting opinions is in the public interest and should be carefully adhered to by reviewing courts. Insofar as material here, it reads: ‘‘ Except in case of conscientious difference of opinion on fundamental principle, dissenting opinions should be discouraged in courts of last resort.” (Vol. 62, Reports of American Bar Association (1937), p. 1129, canon 19.) (Italics added.)1

In the present ease I conscientiously differ from the conclusions and reasoning of the majority opinion. It is my…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Pollard v. LyonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Emde v. San Joaquin County Central Labor CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Washer v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Communist Party of United States of America v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API