Legal Opinion

Mohn v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 6-08-12 (12-1-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 2008No. 6-08-12PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-Appellant, Effie Mohn, appeals from the judgment of the Hardin County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. On appeal, Mohn argues that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment based on a finding that the open and obvious doctrine negated Wal-Mart's duty to her, as a genuine issue of material fact existed on the issue of whether the hazard leading to Mohn's injuries was open and obvious, and that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment based on a finding that the hazardous defect was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Armstrong v. Best Buy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stewart v. AMF Bowling Ctrs., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Coldren v. Northview Shopping Plaza, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. Kemme v. Seltzer Holdings, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Roberts v. United Dairy Farmers, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Ryder v. McGlone's RentalsOhio Court of Appeals · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API