Legal Opinion

Hospodar v. Schick

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 14, 2005PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

DEL SOLE, P.J.:

¶ 1 Mark E. Hospodar, M.D. and Pittsburgh Neurology Associates, Ltd. (“Appellants”) appeal from the March 12, 2003, order denying their preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer. While the appeal is interlocutory in nature, it has been accepted for appellate review pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1311.

¶ 2 This case arises from separate medical malpractice actions filed on behalf of the estates of Patricia A. Schick and Sherry A. Zeis in connection with a fatal automobile accident that occurred on October 18, 2000. The cases were later consolidated pursuant to a March…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estate of Witthoeft v. KiskaddonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. DiMarco v. Lynch Homes-Chester County, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Hykes v. HughesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. DeFazio v. GregorySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pennsy Supply, Inc. v. American Ash Recycling Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commerce Bank/Pennsylvania v. First Union National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Matharu v. MuirSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Burstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. HALL v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API