Legal Opinion

Zarrow v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 23, 1955No. 36191PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORN, Justice.

The plaintiff for his cause of action:against the defendants alleged in his petition that he owned a cattle ranch in which-there was located a certain pasture, and-described the pasture, and claimed that during the year 1951 he was taking cattle for-pasture, and, but for the wrongful acts off the defendants and each of them would have stocked said pasture and that he had-an opportunity to do so. That two of the-defendants, Sam Zarrow and Henry Zar— row, during this period of time owned the oil mining leases and that they, together-with the defendant C. O. Dunn and other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pure Oil Co. v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Franklin Drilling Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Summers v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Moses v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  2. Pintlar Corp. v. Bunker Ltd. PartnershipIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API