Legal Opinion

United States v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 24, 1954No. 22962_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In giving judgment against defendant carrier for potatoes damaged in shipment from Virginia to ConnectiCut, Judge Hincks fixed damages based on the market value at destination, citing Weirton Steel Co. v. Isbrandtsen-Moller Co., 2 Cir., 126 F.2d 593. Defendard; contends that it is liable for only nominal damages, since the potatoes, purchased' as part of the government’s program of price support, were being sent ag a gift to the Connecticut State Hospital at Middletown, Connecticut. ruie applied is the usual one under the Cummins Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 20(11), and is not to be varied by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. CrailSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. McCaull CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Weirton Steel Co. v. Isbrandtsen-Moller Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  4. United States v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fort Worth and Denver Railway Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. United States v. Crown Equipment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Land O'Lakes Creameries, Inc. v. Commodity Credit Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1960
  4. United States v. Fort Worth & Denver Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1956
  5. Fort Worth and Denver Railway Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API