Legal Opinion

Eddes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 1989No. 55934PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

A jury convicted movant of stealing over $150 (specifically a case of cologne), and the court sentenced him as a persistent offender to a 5 year prison term to run consecutive to a 15 year sentence movant was already serving. We affirmed mov-ant’s conviction in State v. Walker, 736 S.W.2d 475 (Mo.App.1987), wherein a statement of the facts can be found.

Movant filed a pro se Rule 29.15 motion, which was amended by counsel, alleging numerous grounds for relief including the claim that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Armour v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Hogshooter v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wilkins v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. State v. HamiltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Simmons v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. State v. BoyceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Melton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API