Eddes v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARD, Judge.
Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
A jury convicted movant of stealing over $150 (specifically a case of cologne), and the court sentenced him as a persistent offender to a 5 year prison term to run consecutive to a 15 year sentence movant was already serving. We affirmed mov-ant’s conviction in State v. Walker, 736 S.W.2d 475 (Mo.App.1987), wherein a statement of the facts can be found.
Movant filed a pro se Rule 29.15 motion, which was amended by counsel, alleging numerous grounds for relief including the claim that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Armour v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Hogshooter v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wilkins v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- State v. HamiltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Simmons v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. BoyceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Melton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.