(PC) Ngo v. Goss
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MY NGO, No. 1:24-cv-01300-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE 13 v. TO THIS ACTION 14 DAN GOSS, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION 15 Defendant. FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF 16 (ECF No. 12) 17 18 19 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 20 U.S.C. § 1983. 21 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed January 2, 2025. 22 I. 23…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.