Legal Opinion

(PC) Ngo v. Goss

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 25, 2025No. 1:24-cv-01300Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MY NGO, No. 1:24-cv-01300-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE 13 v. TO THIS ACTION 14 DAN GOSS, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION 15 Defendant. FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF 16 (ECF No. 12) 17 18 19 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 20 U.S.C. § 1983. 21 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed January 2, 2025. 22 I. 23…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API