Legal Opinion

Vimar Seguros Y Reaseguros, S.A. v. M/v Sky Reefer, Her Engines, Etc., and M.H. Maritima, S.A.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 7, 1994No. 93-2179PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge.

This appeal asks us to decide whether a foreign arbitration clause in a maritime bill of lading governed by the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 46 U.S.C. § 1300 et seq. (COG-SA), is invalid under that statute, or whether such a clause is enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. (FAA). We conclude that the FAA controls, and that the arbitration clause is valid. Accordingly, the order of the district court staying this action pending arbitration in Tokyo is affirmed.

I

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff-appellant Bacchus Associates is a wholesale fruit…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Henley v. Marine TransportionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  2. Vimar Seguros Y Reaseguros, S. A. v. M/V Sky ReeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Lindo v. NCL (Bahamas), Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Sunshine Development, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Liquidating Agent for First Service Bank for SavingsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. DiMercurio v. Sphere Drake Insurance, PLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API