Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commercial Union Insurance v. Chubb Group of Insurance

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 25, 1984Published

1Dissent

BRODY, J.A.D.,

dissenting.

The dispute between these two carriers is over which must pay the excess loss after the doctor’s $200,000 malpractice policy has been exhausted. Chubb contends Commercial should pay on its excess policy that covers “the ultimate net loss” to the doctor. Commercial contends that recourse must first be had to the coverage afforded the doctor as an individual under Chubb’s corporation policy. The parties have presented us with a single issue to decide: does the coverage afforded an individual doctor in the corporation policy include coverage for his malpractice. In my…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. New Jersey Manufacturers Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. New Jersey Manufacturers (Casualty) InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  4. Schultz v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. Ocean Road Partners v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API