Legal Opinion

Aminoil, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 28, 1984No. Cv. 84-5853 Kn (Px), Cv. 84-5863 Kn (Px)PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KENYON, District Judge.

The Court, having heard argument from counsel on September 11, 1984, with respeet to plaintiffs’ motions for a preliminary injunction, and having considered the papers filed thereon, including the additional briefing submitted in response to this Court’s minute orders of September 11, 1984 and September 13, 1984, makes the following findings and order:

The Court makes no ruling with respect to McAuley Oil’s request for a preliminary injunction concerning the federal access order. Since the state and federal governments can gain access to the site under state law,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Paul D. Reardon and John E. Reardon v. United States of America and the United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. Wagner Seed Co. v. DaggettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  3. Jimmy Martin v. Reginald LloydCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  4. J.V. Peters & Co., Inc. v. Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  5. Barmet Aluminum Corp. v. ReillyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API