Sinking Fund Commissioners v. Philadelphia
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
These appeals are from a peremptory writ of mandamus for the payment of $7,667,015.04 to the commis sioners of the sinking funds which the law requires the City of Philadelphia to maintain. The commission is composed of two officers for the time being — the mayor and the city controller — and a third commissioner elected by city council. The petition for the writ was filed in the names of all the commissioners. The city controller, as a defendant, opposed the contentions of his fellow commissioners; he is one of the appellants. The other defendants included the City…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brooke v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Commonwealth ex rel. Hamilton v. Select & Common CouncilsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
- Commonwealth ex rel. Century Co. v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Schuldice v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Ohlinger v. Maidencreek TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sinking Fund Commissioners of Phila. v. Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Kistler v. Carbon CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Clark v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Dickinson v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1951
- Schuchman v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945