Legal Opinion

High River Ltd. Partnership v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 6, 2005No. Civ.A. 1:05-CV-0594PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CONNER, District Judge.

A corporate proxy battle has spilled into the judicial arena. High River Limited Partnership (“High River”), a major shareholder in Mylan Laboratories, Inc. (“My-lan”), alleges that the current Mylan corporate directors, faced with an upcoming annual meeting at which High River and other dissatisfied shareholders would likely elect a new board, amended nomination procedures in an attempt to thwart the election and entrench themselves in their positions. The complaint in this case seeks a declaration that these amendments are null and void.

The latest salvo in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Norman Grayson v. Mayview State Hospital Allegheny County Jail Camp Hill Prison United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  5. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carton v. Choice Point & Choice Point Services, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
  2. DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, LP v. ADAMSDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, LP v. ADAMSDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API