Legal Opinion

In re Kanika M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 27, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Staton, J.), dated April 24, 1998, as, after a fact-finding hearing, found that he had neglected the subject children.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the two subject children were neglected by the father (see, Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]; § 1012 [f| [i]; Matter of K. Children, 253 AD2d 764). The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Lonell J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re Deandre T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re Athena M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. In re K. ChildrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Cantina B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re Tylasia B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. In re Alanna S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. In re Aliciya R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. In re Kierra C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API