In re Kierra C.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*994The Family Court’s determination that the father neglected the subject child was supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act §§ 1012 [f] [i] [B]; 1046 [b] [i]). The evidence established, inter alia, that the father knew or should have known of the mother’s drug use and failed to exercise a minimum degree of care to ensure that the mother did not abuse drugs during her pregnancy (see Matter of Niviya K. [Alfonzo M.], 89 AD3d 1027, 1028 [2011]; Matter of Carlena B., 61 AD3d 752, 752 [2009]; Matter of Cantina B., 26 AD3d 327, 327-328 [2006]; Matter of Kanika M., 270 AD2d 490,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re Niviya K.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re Cantina B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re Carlena B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re K. ChildrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re Kanika M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000