Legal Opinion
Siskonen v. Stanadyne, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided March 15, 1989No. G87-437 CA1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*611OPINION
JOSEPH G. SCOVILLE, United States Magistrate.
This diversity action arises from the discharge of plaintiff from her employment as a territory manager by defendant Moen Division, Stanadyne, Inc. Plaintiff worked for Moen for an eleven-month period from June, 1984, through May 6, 1985, at which time her employment was terminated. She originally brought this action in the Kent County Circuit Court, alleging four claims under Michigan law: (1) a claim for wrongful discharge, under the theory recognized in Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan, 408 Mich. 579, 292 N.W.2d 880…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Banks v. Lockheed-Georgia Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971
- Hardy v. New York News Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- John L. Angelotta v. American Broadcasting Corporation Geraldo Rivera and Barbara WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Payton v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Tharp v. Sivyer Steel Corp.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1993
- Spencer Sav. Bank, SLA v. Excell Mortg. Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Williams v. Vulcan-Hart Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1991