Legal Opinion

Dennehy v. Roberts

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1990No. CC 90C-11740, CA A66633, SC S37507 (Control) CC 90C-11584, CA A66632, SC S37508PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*397PETERSON, C. J.

These consolidated cases come to us on an appeal certified from the Court of Appeals, challenging the judgments of the Marion County Circuit Court. Those judgments enjoin the Secretary of State from printing fiscal impact estimates for Ballot Measures 5, 8 and 11 on the November general election ballot or in the Voters’ Pamphlet. We affirm the circuit court judgments.

ORS 250.125 provides:

“When a state measure involves expenditure of public money by the state, reduction of expenditure of public money by the state, reduction of state revenues or raising of funds by the state by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ClevengerOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State Ex Rel. Bunn v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Crumpton v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State Ex Rel. Anderson v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bassien v. BuchananOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Bassien v. BuchananOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bassien v. BuchananOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Dennehy v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API