Legal Opinion

State v. Stokes

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 2, 2013No. 2012-003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

¶ 1. In these consolidated appeals, defendant challenges his unlawful trespass conviction and his obligation, as a condition of probation, to complete a Domestic Abuse Education Program (DAEP). Defendant also appeals from the court’s denial of his motion to modify his probation conditions and its conclusion that he violated probation by failing to complete DAEP as ordered. We affirm.

¶ 2. Defendant was charged with violating 13 V.S.A. § 3705, which prohibits a person, without legal authority or the consent of the person in lawful possession, from entering or remaining “on any land or in any…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Demore v. KimSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. State v. AustinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  3. In Re Appeal of Bennington School, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  4. State v. SavoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  5. State v. Therrien, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Billy Joe PutnamSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. State v. Billy Joe PutnamSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  3. State v. James KingSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API