Legal Opinion
Attorney General v. Wilson
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 23, 1994No. 09-93-195 CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The Attorney General of Texas, acting under Chapter 76 of the Texas Human Resources Code, initiated this paternity and support action against LaJohn Wilson. The master hearing the ease recommended a $2,652 judgment for retroactive child support, but also recommended the judgment “not to be abstracted or reported to IRS or credit bureau unless Resp falls 60 days delinquent in his monthly report.” The trial court rejected the Attorney General’s appeal from the master’s recommendations. The sole point of error contends the trial court erred in entering orders that prohibited the Attorney…
3Cases cited2 opinions
4Cited by5 opinions
- International Armament Corp., Firearms International Inc. and Alan Aronstein v. Stocker & Lancaster LLP, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- In the Interest of C.A.T.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2010
- In Re Cat, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
- in the Interest of R. G. G., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- in the Interest of R. G. G., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005