Legal Opinion

Sackville v. Mann

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 29, 1943No. 14,891Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goudy

This action, instituted in the district court of Gilpin county, is one in adverse as to an application for patent on a mining claim in said county, filed in the United States Land Office at Denver by plaintiff in error, defendant below. Defendants in error were plaintiffs in the trial court, and we will hereinafter refer to the parties as they there appeared. The findings and judgment were in favor of plaintiffs.

October 15, 1924, plaintiff James Mann and one O. M. Davenport attempted to locate a mining claim known as the East Extension Independence Lode, which was described in the location…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gwillim v. DonnellanSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. McGinnis v. EgbertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  3. Armstrong v. LowerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  4. Pollard v. ShivelySupreme Court of Colorado · 1880
  5. Hallack v. TraberSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API