Legal Opinion
Bartram v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 20, 1991No. G009613PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SONENSHINE, J.
—Is the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), acting as manager of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC) Resolution Trust and receiver for an insolvent savings and loan, protected from a claim of fraud when the debtors have performed their obligations? Relying on D’Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. (1942) 315 U.S. 447 [86 L.Ed. 956, 62 S.Ct. 676], we conclude that it is.
I
Harold and Donna Bartram and Joseph and Vita Tessitors (hereafter the Bartrams) engaged a realtor to sell or exchange two of the four parcels of land they…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc., and v. Santino D. Meo, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Vernon v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Ernest P. Jenkins, Lynne HardinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. WinslowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. FoustCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Armstrong v. Resolution Trust Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Thomka v. Financial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Weber v. New West Federal Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1997